IJRCS REVIEWER'S REPORT SUMMARY FORM
(This information is NOT shared with the author)
SAMPLE ONLY!!!! DO NOT SEND THIS FORM Complete the following:
Name of Reviewer:
Today's date:
Your E-Mail Address:
Manuscript #:
Title of Manuscript:
Rate each criterion in accordance with this scale:
5=excellent; 4=pretty good; 3=so-so; 2=not very good; 1=poor
CONTENT (not necessarily in order of importance):
Clearly states the purpose and context of a study related to choral singing:
5
4
3
2
1
Logically framed research questions or hypotheses:
5
4
3
2
1
Has bibliographic control of applicable related literature
5
4
3
2
1
Clearly states methodology/procedures
5
4
3
2
1
Employs procedures appropriate to the purpose of the study
5
4
3
2
1
Institutes appropriate controls (for gathering of quantitative data) or appropriate source criticism (historical data) or appropriate logic/reasoning (philosophical arguments) or appropriate methodology (for qualitative studies)
5
4
3
2
1
Presents and analyzes data in ways consistent with the research design
5
4
3
2
1
Clearly states the conclusions, and the conclusions specifically address all research questions posed
5
4
3
2
1
Bases conclusions and interpretations on the data reported or analyzed
5
4
3
2
1
Logically discusses implications and/or applications of the study for choral singing
5
4
3
2
1
In the box below, include any other criteria and evaluation that in your opinion, are germane to this particular study.
Overall CONTENT Rating:
5
4
3
2
1
RELEVANCE TO IJRCS
The contribution of this study to the IJRCS mission and purpose
5
4
3
2
1
WRITING STYLE AND ORGANIZATION:
Organizes content so that ideas are effectively communicated
5
4
3
2
1
Adheres to APA, Turabian, or MLA in writing, documentation, and references
5
4
3
2
1
Uses correct grammar and careful sentence construction
5
4
3
2
1
Avoids unnecessary jargon
5
4
3
2
1
Avoids verbosity
5
4
3
2
1
In the box below, include any other criteria and evaluation that in your opinion, are germane to this particular study.
Overall STYLE Rating:
5
4
3
2
1
REVIEWER'S PUBLICATION RECOMMENDATION:
5. Publish.
4. Publish with minor changes as indicated on the Narrative Form.
3. Revise and resubmit. Some changes are required in presentation or interpretation.
2. Revise considerably and resubmit for possible publication. Major changes are required in presentation or methodology.
1. Do not publish. Problems in presentation or methodology are either too great to revise or incorrectable.
Use this space for any CONFIDENTIAL COMMENTS to the Editor regarding this study and/or your review of it:
EDITORIAL BOARD RESOURCES
Reviewer's Report Narrative Form
Back to the homepage
CONTACT US
Email
about
|
contributors
|
submissions
ISSN 02508
All material © 2000 choralresearch.org. All rights reserved.
